Friday, January 18, 2008

** CHRC senior investigator conducts spying operation against the Conservative Website

Canadian “Human Rights” Commission senior investigator conducts spying operation against the Conservative Website

  The dark plot of the CHRC’s Agent Provocateur agenda Exposed!



>>> <<<




Startling news on the Canadian “Human Rights” Commissions plot to entrap Internet message board operators enters a new realm of deviousness.  This “outing” comes on the heels of a hard fought victory by M arc Lemire over the CHRC at the Federal Court of Canada on Tuesday January 15, 2008.

It can now be made public that Dean Steacy, the most senior internet investigator with the fanatical Canadian “Human Rights” Commission has infiltrated the conservative message board website –

CHRC investigator Dean Streacy testified under oath in the Warman v. Lemire case that they only view websites as a result of investigating a complaint, but the latest revelations about Dean Steacy and FreeDominion reveal a much darker and sinister plot that could amount to entrapment of webmasters.


Testimony of Dean Steacy – May 10, 2007


M S KULASZKA: To your knowledge, does the Commission monitor ""?

M R. STEACY: It would depend on whether there is a complaint about something that is on "", or whether or not an individual has posted information on "".

M S KULASZKA: Would the viewing alone of "" be driven by complaints?


M S KULASZKA: So somebody would have to complain about something on "".


Warman v. Lemire – Volume 21, Page 4715-4716


M R. VIGNA: You were asked several questions about whether there is monitoring of the internet and so forth. Can you tell us whether complaints at the Commission, whether they are discrimination complaints that are not section 13 or section 13 complaints, are complaint-driven or if they are initiated by the Commission?

M R. STEACY: They are all complaint-driven.

M R. VIGNA: What does that mean in concrete terms, particularly when it comes to section 13?

M R. STEACY: It means that somebody from outside the Commission has initiated the complaint.

Warman v. Lemire – Volume 21, Page 4853


It is quite clear according to Senior investigator Agent 007, Dean Steacy that the CHRC only investigates websites once a complaint has been received.

In testimony by Dean Steacy at the Tribunal on May 10, 2007, the CHRC invoked Section 37 of the Canada Evidence Act to block all questions on who used the alias “Jadewarr” on the Stormfront message board.  The “Jadewarr” account was used to engage Marc Lemire in conversation with the intent of possible entrapment.

Marc Lemire challenged all invocations of Section 37 to the Federal Court of Canada.  After seven months of litigation, the Canadian Human Rights Commission gave up and admitted partial answers to the questions ask by Marc Lemire’s expert counsel Barbara Kulaszka .

The answers given by Dean Steacy on “Jadewarr” were: [See PDF of actual letter]

1. Do any investigators post on

I am not aware of any investigator other than me, who has posted on Stormfront.

2. Getting back to Jadewarr, do Commission employees sign up accounts on Stormfront, under pseudonyms such as "Jadewarr"?

I used the Jadewarr email address to create an account on Stormfront. I am not aware whether or not other investigators have created other accounts on Stormfront.

3. Do you know who Jadewarr is?

Jadewarr is not a person, it is an email address and a user account on I created the Jadewarr email address on and the Jadewarr account on Stormfront. I have used the Jadewarr email address and the Jadewarr account on Stormfront on occasion, in the course of investigating complaints. I am not aware of anyone else having used the Jadewarr email address or account.

4. To your knowledge, is Jadewarr a Commission employee?

See above.

5. As part of your duties, have you ever signed up with a message board and made postings?

Yes, I have done so using the Jadewarr account in investigating section 13 complaints.


Admissions by CHRC – December 20, 2007


Jadewarr and Dean Steacy.

  So, it’s clear now that Dean Steacy was using the infiltration account “Jadewarr” on, where he attempted to engage Marc Lemire and others on Stormfront.

There was no investigation of Marc Lemire by the Canadian Human Rights Commission at the time, yet Dean Steacy was intent on trying to get users of Stormfront to post material and answer his questions.  Why?  What was his intent? Was this authorized?

Now comes the revelation of FreeDominion. And take a close look at the chronology of what happened back in 2006.


Chronology of CHRC’s Dean Steacy on FreeDominion

 April 5, 2006

Dean Steacy signs up the account “Jadewarr” on and logs in. Uses the official E- M ail address “”


April 19, 2006

A message posted to FreeDominion which forms the basis of a complaint before the Canadian Human Rights Commission filed by Marie-Line Gentes


September 29, 2006

The actual complaint by Gentes is received by the Canadian Human Rights Commission.  Complaint investigated by Sandy Kozak


Why did Dean Steacy sign up an account only a few weeks before a post appears on a public message board that would lead to a CHRC complaint against FreeDominion?

Steacy testified under oath that the CHRC would only visit websites as a result of a complaint received. So what on earth was he doing on FreeDominion just a few weeks before a message was posted that Marie-Line Gentes would later claim was “hate”?

  • Could it be that Steacy indeed posted that message?  
  • Could it be that Steacy somehow advocated for that message to be posted?  
  • Could it be that Steacy was targeting FreeDominion and laid in wait for a message he hoped could shut down FreeDominion?
  • Did Dean Steacy entrap FreeDominion in hopes of having the website suffer huge fines and face lifetime Cease and Desist orders, which would probably result in FreeDominion being shut down?
  • Was Steacy in cahoots with Marie-Line Gentes?
  • Why would Dean Steacy out of the blue sign up an account on FreeDominion only a few days before a message was posted which would have dragged the website operators of FreeDominion before a tribunal where truth, intent and motivation are no defence?

The question might hover around why for a long time and considering the CHRC’s documented abuse of Canadian laws and absolute obsession to hide and cover-up their misdeeds,  the why might not be answered for a while.


Entrapment is the order of the day for the censors.  

  Like bullies in a school yard, they have attacked the weak and helpless to get caselaw and legal “presidents” on the books. Now their fury turns to websites like the Freedomsite and FreeDominion.  They had a big problem tho…  No one was posting anything that would violate law.  Hey not to worry.  The censors are resourceful if nothing else...

  Out of the woodwork came a flurry of “anonymous” posters who would post material they could use to shut down websites they don’t like. Be it material that might be defamatory so you could sue, or material that might violate Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act, where the victim could be dragged before a prolonged costly quasi-legal sessions which would both financially ruin him and destroy his reputation.  ( Marc Lemire has so far been the victim on the CHRC since 2003!  FIVE years!!!!! With no end in sight)

 Could it be just a co-incidence that Steacy happened to show up just weeks before?  I sure doubt it.  As Republican president hopeful Ron Paul said a few weeks ago "In politics, nothing happens by accident. ...

  There is more information to reveal on what Dean Steacy has done, but the Marc Lemire defence team are holding the information in reserve until Mr. Steacy is under oath and on the witness stand.  Where the laws of perjury and Natural Justice apply.


  Infiltration of Message Boards part of a sinister plot

 Earlier in 2007, political dynamo Paul Fromm and the Freedomsite broke the story that Sgt. Stephen Camp of the Edmonton Police “Hate Crimes” was posting vile racist messages on the website.  Officer Camp admitted under oath in the Warman v. Bahr human rights tribunal that he posed online using the alias “Estate” on the message board.

 Some of the comments posted by the head of the “hate crimes” unit included:


  • “Anybody read the Edmonton Journal dated January 22? I know it's a kike publication but...”
  • “With any luck they will end up like the nogs in the states who predominantly kuill each other.”
  • In Reference to Native people he wrote: “retarded little ch-g” and "how can u hold the little redskin responsible he's only an animal..."
  • “Our corrupt government is nothing but a puppet to this so called multicultural agenda.”
  •  “This post again re emphasises the point that our tax dollars are waisted on keeping Zundel behind bars, while M uslim extremists are allowed re entry into Canada and free to come and go as they please.

Infiltration of websites such as Stormfront is part of an organized and darker tactic that is now employed by politicized Police agencies and censorship enforcers.  The Friends of Simon Wiesenthal Center for Holocaust Studies is now offering a new course aimed at Canadian Law enforcement agencies and "investigators" entitled "Investigating Internet Extremism".  According to the Wiesenthal Centre’s website:

   "The workshop works from the premise that in order for law enforcement to be effective in the arena of hate, it must be proactive rather than reactive." The course description continues "Investigating Internet Hate consists of three components; namely infiltration, Internet tools and legalities. In the first section, police officers are introduced to the most frequented web forums, allowing them to become ‘part of the community’ and investigate varying groups and their activities." [Emphasis added] (Copied from Wiesenthal website:

Being “proactive” in terms of a speech related offense can only mean entrapment. As we have seen with Sgt. Stephen Camp of the Edmonton Police, being “proactive” on Stormfront by posting hateful messages, then executing a search warrant against activist Glenn Bahr, and arresting him under the “hate law” for allegedly posting messages onto Stormfront and other internet websites. At one point, Sgt. Camp even called Family Services to have Bahr’s kids taken away. Is Glenn Bahr a victim of entrapment? The charges against him were stayed in 2007.

 Among some of the Police forces that the Wiesenthal Centre list as recipients of their "training" includes:  Ontario Provincial Police, Owen Sound Police Service, Kingston Police Service, Ottawa Police Service, Barrie Police and the Vancouver Police Service.

Next time you see an offensive post online, don’t automatically assume it was some underground neo-nazi / fascist / white supremacist / anti-Semite / Jew-hater / homophobe / anti-immigrant / conservative /  hater.

 Ask yourself if perhaps it was:

  • Dean Steacy?  
  • the Edmonton Police?  
  • Some “hate crimes” unit?  
  • Anti-Racist wacko?
  • Canadian “Human Rights” Commission?
  • People who later file complaints at the CHRC against you?
  • M uslim extremists?
  • Anti-Conservative?



Marc Lemire is a human rights consultant and Certified Computer Systems Engineer and Computer Forensics Technician based in Toronto , Ontario Canada .  He has advised numerous victims of the Canadian Human Rights Commission. In 2005 Mr. Lemire filed a Constitutional Challenge of the Canadian Human Rights Act.  After 25 hearing days, his case is still before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, which amazingly has the power to decide on the constitutionality of its own enabling legislation.







Support Marc Lemire's Constitutional Challenge


Be part of our team and contribute what you can to defeat this horrible law 

and protect Freedom of Speech in Canada !


·         Via Mail: Send Cheque or Money Order to:

Marc Lemire

152 Carlton Street 

PO Box 92545 

Toronto, Ontario 

M5A 2K1 









The Freedom-Site has been constantly online since 1996

Your Donations = Our Survival

152 Carlton Street,

PO Box 92545,

Toronto, Ontario,

M5A 2K1

Please send what you can to help keep our website operational