http://www.freedominion.com.pa/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=96805
CHRT taking submissions on issue of closed hearing! WRITE!
The CHRC has said that they will take submissions from the public on the issue of the closed Warman v Lemire tribunal hearing, but the submissions must be made by
Please write a polite and professional letter to
If you can't write a polite letter, PLEASE DON'T WRITE. You will only hurt our case.
Here is my submission:
| Quote: |
|
|
Canadians Flood the CHRT with demands to stop Secret Hearings
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Tel: (613) 995-1707
Email: gcyr@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca
Attention: Ghislaine Cyr - Registry Officer
Re: Warman v Lemire (T1073/5405)
Dear
This case has become very well known in
I was born in
Out of respect for our democratic freedoms, the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal should allow the Canadian media and public observers to attend the Warman vs. Lemire tribunal hearing.
I thank you for your consideration in this important matter.
Sincerely,
(Name withheld)
-------------------------------------------------
http://www.socon.ca/or_bust/?p=753
Attention: Ghislaine Cyr
RE: Registry Officer Re: Warman v Lemire (T1073/5405)
_____________________________________________________
Dear
I am writing in regards to the Warman vs. Lemire tribunal hearing that is scheduled for
The current conduct of the various human rights commissions in
The credibility of any government organ is dependant on the ability to sustain transparency and fairness. To lose these qualities is to lose the support of the people and the moral authority to operate.
Over the past several weeks, there have been many serious and credible allegations made against the questionable tactics of the Canadian Human Rights Commissions. Since the controversial complaints and the questionable tactics of the CHRC impact all Canadians and their inalienable rights of free speech which are guaranteed under the Charter of Rights of Freedoms, it would be, in my humble opinion, a grave mistake to hold the above hearing behind closed doors. To do so in the current heated environment would only further damage the reputation of the Commission in a very significant way.
A government tribunal which has the power to levy significant fines and cause extreme hardship to their respondents must demonstrate an impeccable and just procedural mechanism for its operations. These necessary qualities are contingent on complete transparency and openness to the public.
If the Commission’s tactics are above reproach, then it has nothing to fear from the public.
John Pacheco, Director
Social Conservatives United
-------------------------------------------------
Dear
I am an immigrant from
I worked in the
I have been following the various troublesome decisions taken by the CHRC over the last few years and more recently the Ezra Levant and
I think it is appalling that in a country like
While in the
I earnestly request you to open the Tribunal Hearings in the Warman vs. Lemire case so that not only is justice done, Justice is SEEN TO BE DONE.
With Kind Regards,
(name withheld)
-------------------------------------------------
Respectful Greetings
Re: Warman v Lemire
I have been following the above mentioned proceedings for some time, now,
and feel it is my responsibility as a free-thinking, Canadian citizen to make
the request that when this hearing reconvenes on
be open to the public, particularly the media.
Only this will prove to myself, and other members of the internet community,
especially those residing in this great nation, that the CHRC has every intent
to proceed with fairness and impartiality to all parties involved.
Sincerely,
(Name withheld)
-------------------------------------------------
Re: Warman v Lemire (T1073/5405)
It has been brought to my attention that
How can Hadjis claim to be "sensitive" to human rights and portray himself as an "impartial Chair" when he is taking extreme measures to shield his companions and co-workers at the commission from public scrutiny?
Dozens of Canadians have suffered the degradation of these hearings without any regard to abiding by rules of evidence and natural justice by either the commission or the CHRT - including
I expect the Hadjis to live up to the standards he advocates and show the public there is no favourism, to reverse his decision to keep the
(name withheld)
-------------------------------------------------
Dear
I am writing about the disturbing decision by member Hadjis in the Lemire case to keep the
Knowing what I know about the case and how it has progressed, I can't see it as anything more than an effort to shield the Commission (which is technically supposed to be independent of the Tribunal) the embarrassment of having their dirty underwear hung out in front of the public.
I urge the Tribunal to reverse this decision on their own accord because the only thing about the CHRT that is transparent now is their likeness to 3rd world dictatorial courts and rubber-stamp processes. The Tribunal seems to have lost its sense of sanity.
Respectfully Submitted,
Alexan Kulbashian
| |
Stop Section 13!