Is it any wonder there is a 100% conviction rate!
JULY 4, 2008: In Canada, paid lobbyists are required to register with the Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying of Canada. This is part of the Lobbyists Registration Act, which came into effect on January 31, 1996.
Paid lobbyists are required to report who they have lobbied, along with a variety of other information, such as government grants received, what was lobbied for, etc. A search of the new Lobbyists Registration System has yielded some very surprising results.
The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal describes itself as “much like a court.” The Tribunal’s website goes on to state: “the Tribunal's role in all situations is comparable to that of a judge, deciding the case fairly and impartially by weighing all the evidence introduced by all parties and deciding if discrimination under the Act has occurred.”
So, if the Tribunal is “much like a court” and it’s role is that of a “judge” -- why are paid lobbyists trying to persuade and influence the Tribunal? Could this explain the 100% conviction rate the Tribunal has for Section 13, the notorious internet censorship provision?
It would be totally inappropriate for a large company like the Royal Bank of
Jewish/Zionist journalist and blogger Ezra Levant recently denounced these “official jewish” organizations for their claim that Section 13 is needed for Jewish “psychological security.”
In his popular blog,
I’m not the only Jew who didn't get the groupthink memo from our so-called "representatives". It seems that Jonathan Kay, George Jonas, David Frum, Kevin Libin, Michael Ross and Karen Selick of the National Post (not to mention the Asper family), Edward Greenspon of the Globe and
Each of the aforementioned individuals has come out against section 13. But that's the problem: they're individuals. The Official Jews, the Professional Jews, the Jews Who Are Jews for a Living, say that we're all just one big blob of "Jews" who think as we're told to think by them.
Stop Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act