Saturday, June 13, 2009

CHRC claims to only police "extreme hate messages" WHAT A LIE

CHRC claims to only police "extreme hate messages"  WHAT A LIE


The Canadian “Human Rights” Commission just released a report to Parliament, where the CHRC is demanding they keep their foot in the censorship business with Section 13.  This flies in the face of a report the CHRC paid over $50,000 to Constitutional Professor, Robert Moon, whose primary recommendation was that the CHRC should get out of the thought control business and repeal Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act.


One of the chief lies of the Canadian Human Rights Commission in their recent media blitz, was to claim that the CHRC only targets “extreme hate messages.”   This is bull and has been clearly documented over the past few years to be an absurd lie.


The CHRC routinely dismissed “extreme hate” complaints against their friends and against anyone who doesn’t have White skin.  The CHRC only see “haters” as those who are White and classified as “right-wing”.  If you’re a Muslim extremist, posting some of the most extreme hate available on the Internet,  the CHRC will dismiss the complaint right away, by claiming it does not “meet the test of hate.”  According to the anti-White fanatics at the CHRC,  if you’re a Muslim,  it is not hate to say that gays should be "beheaded", Jews "spread corruption", Hindus must "be killed."





The CHRC is currently trying to hold Marc Lemire liable for promotion of hate, for allegedly posting the following poem:


(warning,   I am about to commit a “hate crime” by reproducing a poem the CHRC claims is hate!)


I cross ocean, poor and broke, Take bus, see employment folk.

Nice man treat me, good in there, Say I need to see welfare.

Welfare say, "You come no more, We send cash right to your door."

Welfare checks, they make you wealthy, Medicaid it keep you healthy!


By and by, I got plenty money, Thanks to you, Canadian dummy.

Write to friends in motherland, Tell them 'come fast as you can.'

They come in turbans and Ford trucks, I buy big house with welfare bucks

They come here, we live together, More welfare checks, it gets better!


Fourteen families, they moving in, But neighbor's patience wearing thin.

Finally, white guy moves away, Now I buy his house, and then I say,

"Find more aliens or house to rent." And in the yard I put a tent.

Send for family they just trash, But they, too, draw the welfare cash!

Everything is very good, And soon we own the neighborhood.


We have hobby -- it's called breeding, Welfare pay for baby feeding.

Kids need dentist? Wife need pills? We get free! We got no bills!

Canadian crazy! He pay all year, To keep welfare running here.

We think Canada darn good place! Too darn good for the white man race.

If they no like us, they can scram, Got lots of room in Pakistan.



Just to show you how nuts the CHRC really is.   The CHRC has pursued this case against Marc Lemire for 2,044 days to persecute him for allegedly posting the “immigrant Poem.”


In their closing arguments and in multiple written submissions, The CHRC claims the “immigrant Poem” is extreme hate and extreme ill will.  The CHRC further go on to demand a LIFETIME gag order against Lemire along with thousands of dollars in fines.


In their closing arguments, the CHRC actually submitted that:


86. “Canadian Immigrant Poem” is implicitly about Pakistani immigrants and refers explicitly to immigrants on the basis of religion, race, colour, and national and ethnic origin.  It refers to immigrants as “aliens” and “trash”, who arrive in Canada “wearing turbans”.  It stereotypes these immigrants as non-contributors to Canadian Society who take unfair advantage of welfare and other Canadian social assistance programs, live “fourteen families” in a house and are so unpleasant as to force their white neighbours to move away.


87.  It is submitted that this is a gross caricature of Pakistani and other East Asian immigrants to Canada, amounting to an expression of extreme ill will and utter contempt, and as such is likely to expose Pakistani immigrants to hatred or contempt within the meaning of section 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act.



Talk about a band of rights maniacs and enforcers.   YOU shut up, or else a LIFETIME gag order will be placed around your mouth.  You dare to speak up again… up to 5 YEARS IN JAIL for you!



As has been thoroughly documented, the CHRC is totally corrupt and incapable of conducting a proper investigation into what constitutes “hatred and/or contempt”.  This is primarily due to the fact that the CHRC are actually some of the biggest racists in Canada.  The CHRC only ever see hate if it comes from the lips of someone with White skin.  While that might sound like a radical statement,  consider this:  In the over 30 year history of the CHRC,  they have ONLY ever prosecuted Whites,  whose opinions they classify as “right-wing”  or Christian.


Here is a little article I wrote last year, which really drives home the racist and discriminatory nature of the CHRC and their so-called “investigative techniques”




At the Canadian Human Rights Commission


Some “hate” is bad -- Some “hate” is fine

just depends who you are.



With the recent self-preserving decision by the Canadian Human Rights Commission to not accept the complaint against Macleans Magazine, now is a good time to expose the politically motivated CHRC’s investigative techniques.


The CHRC’s investigation techniques have come under fire by many recently.  As of August, 2008, the CHRC is under a criminal investigation by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police.  A Privacy Act investigation by the Privacy Commissioner of Canada.  The Justice Committee in the House of Commons is considering another investigation on the CHRC investigation techniques. And even the CHRC is investigating themselves by retaining an outside (hand-picked) consultant to review their policies, Prof. Moon from University of Windsor


This article is going to cover the completely unreported aspects of how the CHRC investigates Section 13 complaints, and how they make ridiculously biased decisions to protect their friends and “key stakeholders”, while at the same time bankrupting little people who are not their friends or who do not command the attention of Canada’s media and able to generate public interest.


Ruled as “HATE” by the CHRC


“That drives me nuts, I take photos for the citizenship, passports, pr (permanent residence), visa cards etc. and as I have been told from human resourses that the ears MUST be visable, which means, if your hair covers your ears, it has to be tucked back.

I don’t care if it’s a religious thing or not, if you don’t want to follow our rules, even if it is taking off your scarf thing for one lousy picture, then stay out of my effing country!”


(Oct 26, 2007 decision of the Canadian “Human Rights” Tribunal in Warman v. BeaumontPara 16)





Ruled as “FINE” by the CHRC


“JEWSmedia hushes up MURDERS of Whites committed by NIGGERS ALL THE TIME AND EVERYWHERE! Not only in the U.S. of A."


"It annoys the hell out of me when those filthy Jews take on non-Jew surnames"


"Thanks for the link MacDonald. I'll use the images to make a nice big poster for the next annual queer parade in my city. That jar sticking out of the fags ass is way better than any slogan I could come up with. Our local White 'Hate' group protests the fags every year and I'm already looking forward to the next one."


(Oct 17, 2006 - CHRC decision against RecomNetwork and Alan Dutton)


Jessica Beaumont is a young women at the start of her career.  During the December 2006 Tribunal hearing, she testified she was very poor and only made $10/hour at her job.  Shamefully the Tribunal ordered Mrs. Beaumont to pay a fine of $4,500 and only gave her 120 days to do it.  Which of course is impossible for her to do, while making so little money.


Contrast that to the comments found on the website RecomNetwork.Org.  This site is owned by Alan Dutton.  It had some of the most viscous racist and anti-Semitic comments in all of Canada, BUT the Canadian Human Rights Commission are close friends with it’s owner -  Mr. Alan Dutton whom they have referred to as a “key stakeholder.”


It has been proven over the years that the CHRC is always willing to prostitute itself for their friends. When Andrew Guille filed a Section 13 against RecomNetwork, the CHRC actually took the unprecedented move of calling the police on Mr. Guille! Talk about sheer loonacy.